Often, employers do not learn the extent of a former employee’s misconduct until after the employer ends the employment relationship or the employee resigns. This information may be useful if the former employee pursues litigation against the employer because it can be used as the basis for asserting the after-acquired evidence defense.Read more »
- February 14, 2020 Trademark Update: New USPTO Rules Include Widely Criticized Applicant Email Requirements
- February 13, 2020 Coronavirus – Employers, Be Smart! Be Prepared!
- January 06, 2020 Tax Return Theft: Tips for Prevention and Response
#metoo 7th circuit 9th circuit affordable care act agreements alcohol ban the box breach of contract business california california supreme court ccpa cobra colorado compensation compliance confidentiality conflict waivers controlled substances act criminal action data security department of labor discrimination double representation dress code eeoc employee status employers employment employment agreements employment law equal pay equal pay act eu exempt employees fcra firing first amendment fiscal new year flsa free speech glass ceiling hacking hairstyle harassment health health insurance hiring holiday season human resources iep information security investigation labor law lay off marijuana medical leave medical loss ratio medical marijuana me too minimum wage new jersey new york non-competition non-disclosure agreements non-solicitation notice requirements office party overtime paid sick leave parental leave payroll premium rebate rate of pay record keeping reduction in force regulations retaliation salary scheduling secret sauce security settlement sex discrimination sexual harassment smartphones social media supreme court technology temporary employees termination tip credit title vii trade secrets wages wage transparency washington work from home workplace policy written consent