Often, employers do not learn the extent of a former employee’s misconduct until after the employer ends the employment relationship or the employee resigns. This information may be useful if the former employee pursues litigation against the employer because it can be used as the basis for asserting the after-acquired evidence defense.Read more »
- February 14, 2020 Trademark Update: New USPTO Rules Include Widely Criticized Applicant Email Requirements
- February 13, 2020 Coronavirus – Employers, Be Smart! Be Prepared!
- January 06, 2020 Tax Return Theft: Tips for Prevention and Response
9th circuit affordable care act after-acquired evidence agreements appellate apple artificial intelligence brexit business california california supreme court ccpa civil rights cobra colorado compensation compliance confidentiality data security defend trade secrets act department of labor discrimination dress code economic loss rule eeoc employee handbook employee notices employee safety employer liability employers employment employment agreements employment law equal pay equal pay act essential employees eu exemptions fcra feha firing first amendment flsa free speech germany hacking hairstyle healthcare health coverage health insurance hiring holiday season human resources information security insider threat labor law lay off marijuana medical leave medical loss ratio medical marijuana minimum wage misconduct new jersey new york non-competition non-disclosure non-employees non-solicitation nyc offer of employment on-call overtime payroll petition pregnancy disability leave premium rebate reduction in force regulations reporting-time retail industry retention salary history inquiry seasonal workers senior care sexual harassment small employers social media supreme court technology termination tip act tip credit tipped employees title vii trade secrets wage & hour law wages washington workplace policy