All Blog postsIn Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that 35 U.S.C. §314(d) precludes judicial review of Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) application of the one-year time bar in a decision to institute an inter partes review (IPR).
Read more »Tag: america invents act
-
Supreme Court Holds PTAB Decisions Concerning One-Year Time Bar to File IPR Are Not Judicially Reviewable Posted on: May 11, 2020 In: Intellectual Property & Technology
-
Who May Petition for Post-Grant Review Under The AIA? Posted on: April 20, 2020 In: Intellectual Property & TechnologyUnder the America Invents Act of 2011 (AIA), any “person” other than the patent owner may challenge the patent owner’s patent(s) through post-grant review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The patent statutes do not specifically define the term “person.” The presumption is that the term “person” does not include the federal government and its agencies.
Read more »
-
USPTO Supports “Counterintuitive” Interpretation of AIA in Amicus Brief to Fed Circuit Court of Appeals Posted on: March 07, 2019 In: Intellectual Property & TechnologyOral Arguments Scheduled for Next Week - In a curious legal scenario, the USPTO recently filed an amicus brief at the request of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, supporting a “counterintuitive” reading of the American Invents Act (AIA). This stems from an interesting argument made by Johnson & Johnson subsidiary company Janssen Oncology, Inc. regarding estoppel under the AIA.
Read more »
-
Supreme Court Rules that AIA Did Not Alter the On-Sale Doctrine Posted on: January 24, 2019 In: Intellectual Property & Technology
The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that the phrase “or otherwise available to the public” added to 35 U.S.C. § 102 in the America Invents Act in 2011 did not change the “on-sale” doctrine, which provides that patent protection cannot be granted for an invention that was on-sale more than one year before the effective filing date of the patent.
Read more »
-
2018 in review – Inter Partes Review Developments, Part 1 of 2 Posted on: December 07, 2018 In: Intellectual Property & TechnologyIn one of the most heavily anticipated, and in some ways controversial, decision of the year, the Supreme Court ruled in Oil States Energy Services v. Green’s Energy Group to uphold the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) authority to invalidate patents by inter partes review.
Read more »
Blog Search
Featured Posts
- May 10, 2022 NCAA Takes Action to Address “Collectives” and “Booster” Involvement in NIL Activity
- May 09, 2022 Can Your Coffee Maker Be Hacked? Cybersecurity Issues and the Growing Internet of Things
- April 15, 2022 Federal Law Ends Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Claims
Blog Tags
9th circuit
ada
america invents act
breach notification
california
ccpa
colorado
compensation
compliance
congress
consumer data
consumer notification
copyright
coronavirus
covid-19
cpra
cybersecurity
cyber threat
data breach
data privacy
data security
disability
discrimination
dress code
eeoc
employee benefits
employee handbook
employers
employment agreements
employment law
equal pay
european union
executive order
family leave
fbi
fcra
federal circuit
flsa
fmla
gdpr
hacking
hairstyle
healthcare
hhsocr
hipaa
hiring
holiday season
human resources
identity theft
illinois
incident response
infringement
inter partes review
irs
labor law
legislative alert
litigation
malware
marijuana
medical leave
minimum wage
multi-factor identification
ncaa
new jersey
new york
nil
non-competition
osha
overtime
paga
paid leave
patent law
patent litigation
patents
payroll
personal data
personal information
phishing
privacy law
privacy protection patchwork
ptab
ransomware
reasonable accommodation
regulations
sexual harassment
social media
sports law
statute
student-athletes
supreme court
tax returns
termination
title vii
trademark
trade secrets
virginia
wage and hour
wages
washington
workplace safety