A recent decision issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois seems to stand for the proposition that the risk of harm to an individual stemming from a violation of the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act is so great that an impacted individual need not establish actual harm or injury to bring a claim. Rather, according to the Supreme Court of Illinois, exposure to the risk of actual harm or injury, standing alone, is sufficient.Read more »
Illinois Expands the Definition of “Injury” Under the Biometric Information Privacy Act Posted on: March 01, 2019 In: Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
- June 03, 2019 CCPA’s Final Requirements in Flux, with Six Months to Go to Comply - Part 1 of 3: Where Does the Law Stand Now?
- May 23, 2019 Non-Competition Agreements – Bracing Yourself Against the Winds of Change
- May 20, 2019 Supreme Court Issues Major Ruling on the Ongoing Viability of Trademark Licenses by Bankrupt Entities