A recent decision issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois seems to stand for the proposition that the risk of harm to an individual stemming from a violation of the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act is so great that an impacted individual need not establish actual harm or injury to bring a claim. Rather, according to the Supreme Court of Illinois, exposure to the risk of actual harm or injury, standing alone, is sufficient.Read more »
- March 14, 2019 ‘Full Moon’ Costs Denied by Supreme Court in Oracle Copyright Case
- March 12, 2019 FLSA Double Time
- February 27, 2019 It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, No… It’s Cryptojacking!
2fa aba alabama anti-money laundering arkansas audit biometric bitcoin blockchain breach notification california ccpa checklist client notification colorado commission congress consumer notification cryptocurrency cybersecurity cyber threat data breach data privacy data privacy directive data privacy officer data protection officer data security delaware department of commerce department of financial services department of health and human services department of state department of transportation electronic benefit transfer email employment encryption attack ethereum ethics eu eu-u.s. data privacy shield eu-u.s. privacy shield european union fcc fcra federal communication federal trade commission financial firms financial services gdpr hacking hipaa hippa homeland security identity fraud identity theft illinois incidence response plan irs malware maritime cybersecurity maryland massachusetts multi-factor identification net neutrality new mexico ninth circuit nist security controls nydfs ocabr patching penalties personal data phishing pre-breach services privacy act ransomeware ransomware rdp regulations remote desktop protocol security posture assessment security vulnerabilities service provider agreement social engineering social media south dakota spear-phishing spokeo ssn statute supreme court tax returns tennessee third party utah virginia virus w2 workplace policy