Since 2008, California courts have refused to enforce non-solicitation of customer provisions in employment contracts. On November 1, 2018, in AMN Healthcare, Inc. v Aya Healthcare Services, Inc., the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District expanded this concept to include non-solicitation of employees restrictions (also known as anti-raiding provisions) as well.Read more »
- March 14, 2019 ‘Full Moon’ Costs Denied by Supreme Court in Oracle Copyright Case
- March 12, 2019 FLSA Double Time
- February 27, 2019 It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, No… It’s Cryptojacking!
9th circuit after-acquired evidence agreements america invents act anti-money laundering audit bank secrecy act bitcoin breach notification business california canada cease and desist client notification compliance confidentiality congress consent order consumer consent consumer notification copyright copyright act critical security controls cryptocurrency cybersecurity cyber threat data breach data privacy data security dmarc electronic protected health information employers employment equifax essential employees eu eu-u.s. privacy shield european parliament european unioin european union fcra federal circuit federal trade commission fines first sale doctrine foreign filing gdpr hacking hipaa hippa identity theft illinois indictment infringement internet service provider inter partes review irs justice department malware massachusetts meltdown me too michigan microsoft office 365 misconduct multi-factor identification new mexico new york nist framework nist security controls non-competition nydfs ocabr oregon passwords patent litigation patents payroll personal data personnel records pipeda ptab ransomware regulations scheduling secret sauce security rule social engineering social media spectre statute supervisory authorities supreme court tax preparers tax returns technology trade secrets uspto virginia w2